Viewing: Alternative Summative Assessment: MHA Capstone

Last approved: 2026-06-08T05:08:52Z

Last edit: 2026-06-08T05:08:19Z

Changes proposed by: Mendy Gayler (College of Health, Administrative Assistant) (gaylerm)
Summer 2026
Alternative Summative Assessment
Alternative Summative Assessment: MHA Capstone
Name
Mendy Gayler (College of Health, Administrative Assistant)
Aurae Beidler (School of Public Health, Asisstant Professor of Teaching)
Health (26)
School of Nutrition & Public Health
 

Other Request

 

Early Alert

 

These questions are designed to produce the equivalent of a 2-page summary of the proposed program that can be used to create an Early Alert document that will be submitted to the Statewide Provosts Council.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. What is the anticipated enrollment (Fall Term headcount) at the launch of the program and the planned goals for 5 and 10 years out?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Create, Change or Terminate a College or Academic Unit

 
 
 

Executive Summary

 

Location

 

 

Curriculum Mapping

 

Objectives, Functions, and Activities

 
 
 
 

Resources

 
 
 

Mission

 
 

Strategic Plan

 

External Impacts

 
 

Accreditation

 

Appendices

New Subject Code

 
 
 
 

Purpose

The proposed course designator should have an identified purpose within the curricular structure of Oregon State University.
 
 
 

Accountability

Responsibility for the integrity and oversight of the proposed course designator should be clearly identified.
 
 
 
 

Impacts

Who will benefit from the new course designator, and what changes will result from its implementation.
 
 
 
 
 

Mass Subject Code Change

 
 
 



Change College Requirements (Obsolete)

 

 
 
 
 

Microcredential Request

 
 

General Information

 
 
 

 

Description and Requirements

 
 
 
 

 
 

Skills

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Strategic Plan

 

 
 
 
 

Administrative Resources






 

Request to Retain a Course

Course Details

Memorandum of Understanding

MOU for Offering an Existing Academic Program at a Different Physical Campus

 
 
 
 

Program Coordination Requirements

OSU-Cascades leadership and the College Dean agree that there is sufficient coordination of the program between all campuses offering the program.



Both (all) campuses agree that the following individuals are appointed as the primary lead for program development coordination, unless otherwise notified of an alternate:
 
 
 
 

Course Delivery



Program Maintenance

A major factor in continued excellence is the maintenance and refreshment of courses and the program. As part of maintenance, the College and any campus offering the program commit to the following:



Funding


Partnership Agreement


CIP Code Change

 
Is this a STEM CIP?

 
 
Is this a STEM CIP?

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Alternative Summative Assessment

Alternative Summative Assessments (ASA) are a substitution for the committee-driven oral exam present in most MA/MS degrees. The ASA should provide similar insights as the oral exam into the program and graduate learning outcomes.
Master of Healthcare Administration
Other Master
Mater of Healthcare Administration
 
New assessment plan
 
The Master of Healthcare Administration (MHA) prepares graduates for complex leadership roles that require the integration of strategic, operational, ethical, and systems-level competencies. As a professional practice degree, the MHA necessitates a summative assessment that evaluates students’ ability to apply and synthesize program learning outcomes in real-world healthcare contexts, rather than relying on a discrete oral examination or isolated knowledge-based assessment. A capstone project provides a comprehensive, applied measure of student readiness by requiring learners to analyze complex organizational challenges, translate strategic vision into operational plans, engage stakeholders, and communicate recommendations at an executive level.

The Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education (CAHME) accredits graduate programs in healthcare administration. CAHME states that programs must develop a final integrative assessment at the program level that demonstrates attainment of graduate competencies. This is explicit in Criterion 3.2 (Final Integrative Assessment) within the 2026 Standards. This assessment must occur at the end of the program, integrate multiple competencies, demonstrate students can apply learning in a real-world or professional context and serve as a direct measure of program-level competency attainment.

CAHME lists the types of direct assessment measures that can be used for the final integrative assessment in Criterion 2.2: Examples: capstone, comprehensive written or oral examination, portfolios, presentations, comprehensive case analysis, practicum feedback. Can include more than one.

The capstone project approach aligns with best practices in professional graduate education, supports experiential learning, and provides more valid and reliable evidence of workforce readiness, ethical judgment, and leadership competency than an oral exam alone.
 
Students pursuing an MHA must produce a culminating project that is comprehensive and demonstrates proficiency in program level outcomes. Students apply leadership and analytical skills to design, execute, and evaluate a real-world project or policy analysis addressing a significant issue in healthcare administration. Students may complete an Applied Organizational Project or Case Study Analysis Project. Each pathway emphasizes evidence-based decision making, data analysis, and leadership in change implementation.

Students demonstrate proficiency by producing an integrated, applied capstone project addressing a real organizational or community health problem using appropriate data, evidence, and professional standards. The faculty-evaluated applied project includes the problem definition, literature review, data analysis, stakeholder engagement, and recommendations. Students prepare and deliver an executive presentation as well as a Competency Portfolio and Professional Growth Reflection as part of the full project deliverable for both project types. The capstone course will be completed in the last term. The major professor will assess the graduate and program learning outcomes and is guided by a standardized rubric. The major professor will conduct this assessment and send the assessment form to the COH DAA who will compile data annually. Details are attached.
Is the student assigned a traditional three-graduate-faculty member committee?
 
No
 
The Major Professor will provide the assessment.
 
The MHA program will use a competency assessment form guided by grading rubric that was developed in consultation with the COH DAA. This will be filled out by the Major professor upon review of the product of the student’s culminating project. The competency assessment and rubric is attached.
 
The Major Professor
 
The Major Professor
 
The Major Professor
 
The Major professor advises the student to ensure degree requirements are met and the student needs and interests are included. The Major professor and two other public health or healthcare administration faculty members will be the signatories.

Statement of Intent

Acknowledgement

 

 

Proposed Course Details

Are you proposing more than one Core Ed course in this form?

 
 
 
 
 
 

Is this a new OSU course?

 
 
Is this course currently in the Bacc Core?

 
Is this course part of a College of Science series?

Is this a Common Course Numbered (CCN) course?

Additional Courses

Prerequisites and Restrictions

 

Description

 
 

Justification

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Modality

 

Faculty (Re)Designing The Course

 

In-person and Hybrid Courses

 

Ecampus Courses

 

Ecampus and Other Locations

 

Ecampus and Other Locations

 

Ecampus and Other Locations

 

Ecampus and Other Locations

 

WIC Courses

 

DPO Courses

 

Policy Update

 
 

 
 
 

Admin Use Only

The Alternative Summative Assessment request has been approved. More information about ASAs can be found in the Policies Governing Graduate Programs: https://catalog.oregonstate.edu/college-departments/graduate-education/#policiestext

Please contact the Office of Graduate Education with questions about the ASA: https://graduate.oregonstate.edu/faculty
Peggy Dolcini (School of Nutrition & Public Health, School Head) (peggy.dolcini) (2026-03-18T00:40:28Z): Support
Veronica Irvin (School of Nutrition & Public Health, Associate Professor) (veronica.irvin) (2026-04-02T17:44:40Z): I am the representative from COH on Grad Council and I discussed this ASA with the faculty originator and Associate Dean's office. Below are a few clarifying points around the evaluation of the ASA with only a single faculty reviewer. The capstone is part of HHS581 course. The major professor will assess whether the Capstone Project met expectations for the competencies, passing being 80% or higher (see rubric). Students who fail will have the opportunity to revise their Capstone Project for a second evaluation. The major professor will evaluate the Capstone Project according to their assessment of whether the Capstone Project met expectations for each competency and synthesis. Based on the assessment, the major professor will record within the cells whether the student did not meet, met, or exceeded expectations for each of the competencies and synthesis. The major professor will indicate whether the student has passed or failed the Capstone Project. The major professor will discuss results with the student who can document a response/comments. The student may request a re-evaluation by the major professor or for another program faculty to evaluate the Capstone Project. The major professor and other faculty(involved) will sign their Capstone Project Assessment Form and have the student sign. The major professor and other faculty (if involved) will then send the Capstone Project Assessment Form to the MHA Program Director, who will make the final decision (based on major professor’s evaluation and other faculty’s evaluation (if involved)) and record. The form will be sent electronically via Docusign.
Key: 1009